↓ Skip to main content

Calcitonin testing for detection of medullary thyroid cancer in people with thyroid nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcitonin testing for detection of medullary thyroid cancer in people with thyroid nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010159.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Hg Verbeek, Jan Willem B de Groot, Wim J Sluiter, Anneke C Muller Kobold, Edwin R van den Heuvel, John Tm Plukker, Thera P Links

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 70 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Decision Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 75 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,337,151
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,381
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,683
of 395,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.