↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing Versus Oral Debriefing Alone at Improving Neonatal Resuscitation Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
The Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing Versus Oral Debriefing Alone at Improving Neonatal Resuscitation Performance
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, August 2012
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e3182578eae
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor Sawyer, Agnes Sierocka-Castaneda, Debora Chan, Benjamin Berg, Mike Lustik, Mark Thompson

Abstract

Debriefing is a critical component of effective simulation-based medical education. The optimal format in which to conduct debriefing is unknown. The use of video review has been promoted as a means of enhancing debriefing, and video-assisted debriefing is widely used in simulation training. Few empirical studies have evaluated the impact of video-assisted debriefing, and the results of those studies have been mixed. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing to oral debriefing alone at improving performance in neonatal resuscitation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
Poland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Other 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 11%
Other 35 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Unspecified 8 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 4 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,046,653
of 13,434,955 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#35
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,104
of 121,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,434,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.