↓ Skip to main content

Physical fitness training for stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Saunders, Mark Sanderson, Sara Hayes, Liam Johnson, Sharon Kramer, Daniel D Carter, Hannah Jarvis, Miriam Brazzelli, Gillian E Mead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 18%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 11%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 89 26%
Unknown 52 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 11%
Sports and Recreations 37 11%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 65 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#359,284
of 15,781,964 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#836
of 11,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,425
of 269,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,781,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.