↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Number needed to treat and cost-effectiveness in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Number needed to treat and cost-effectiveness in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Published in
Critical Care, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11346
Pubmed ID
22676505
Authors

Duncan Wyncoll, Luigi Camporota

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
France 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#12,960,778
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,367
of 6,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,774
of 167,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.