↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in the neural mechanisms mediating addiction: a new synthesis and hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Sex Differences, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex differences in the neural mechanisms mediating addiction: a new synthesis and hypothesis
Published in
Biology of Sex Differences, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/2042-6410-3-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill B Becker, Adam N Perry, Christel Westenbroek

Abstract

In this review we propose that there are sex differences in how men and women enter onto the path that can lead to addiction. Males are more likely than females to engage in risky behaviors that include experimenting with drugs of abuse, and in susceptible individuals, they are drawn into the spiral that can eventually lead to addiction. Women and girls are more likely to begin taking drugs as self-medication to reduce stress or alleviate depression. For this reason women enter into the downward spiral further along the path to addiction, and so transition to addiction more rapidly. We propose that this sex difference is due, at least in part, to sex differences in the organization of the neural systems responsible for motivation and addiction. Additionally, we suggest that sex differences in these systems and their functioning are accentuated with addiction. In the current review we discuss historical, cultural, social and biological bases for sex differences in addiction with an emphasis on sex differences in the neurotransmitter systems that are implicated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 286 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 22%
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Student > Master 34 12%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 55 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 58 20%
Psychology 52 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 74 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,905,640
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Sex Differences
#122
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,285
of 181,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Sex Differences
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.