↓ Skip to main content

Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer’s degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
72 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer’s degeneration
Published in
Brain, March 2020
DOI 10.1093/brain/awaa012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Fernández-Cabello, Martin Kronbichler, Koene R A Van Dijk, James A Goodman, R Nathan Spreng, Taylor W Schmitz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 40 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 34 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#711,714
of 22,559,910 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#700
of 7,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,673
of 296,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#25
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,559,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.