↓ Skip to main content

Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer’s degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
69 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer’s degeneration
Published in
Brain, March 2020
DOI 10.1093/brain/awaa012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Fernández-Cabello, Martin Kronbichler, Koene R A Van Dijk, James A Goodman, R Nathan Spreng, Taylor W Schmitz, on behalf of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 47 34%
Psychology 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#887,567
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#856
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,166
of 373,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#22
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.