↓ Skip to main content

Correction: External validation of risk prediction models for incident colorectal cancer using UK Biobank

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: External validation of risk prediction models for incident colorectal cancer using UK Biobank
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-0767-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Usher-Smith, A. Harshfield, C. L. Saunders, S. J. Sharp, J. Emery, F. M. Walter, K. Muir, S. J. Griffin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,610,517
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#10,134
of 10,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,025
of 364,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#102
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.