↓ Skip to main content

Correction: External validation of risk prediction models for incident colorectal cancer using UK Biobank

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: External validation of risk prediction models for incident colorectal cancer using UK Biobank
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-0767-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Usher-Smith, A. Harshfield, C. L. Saunders, S. J. Sharp, J. Emery, F. M. Walter, K. Muir, S. J. Griffin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,008,715
of 15,886,334 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#8,606
of 8,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,340
of 269,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#121
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,886,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.