↓ Skip to main content

A new way of noninvasive ventilation in ICU patients. An innovation modification of the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) face mask Boussignac–Vygon in order to use it in chronic obstructive…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new way of noninvasive ventilation in ICU patients. An innovation modification of the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) face mask Boussignac–Vygon in order to use it in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (type II) patients
Published in
Critical Care, March 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2476
Authors

S Papanikolaou, P Polakis, S Papanikolaou, V Niakas, M Daveronas, O Iordanidou, G Tasopoulos, Th Tsouka, M Polaki, L Lira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,992
of 63,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.