↓ Skip to main content

Actors and justifications in media debates on Arctic climate change in Finland and Canada: A network approach

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Sociologica (Sage Publications, Ltd.), March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Actors and justifications in media debates on Arctic climate change in Finland and Canada: A network approach
Published in
Acta Sociologica (Sage Publications, Ltd.), March 2020
DOI 10.1177/0001699319890902
Authors

Anna Kukkonen, Mark CJ Stoddart, Tuomas Ylä-Anttila

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,754,543
of 15,038,563 outputs
Outputs from Acta Sociologica (Sage Publications, Ltd.)
#93
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,665
of 243,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Sociologica (Sage Publications, Ltd.)
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,038,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.