↓ Skip to main content

High quality draft genome sequence of Segniliparus rugosus CDC 945T= (ATCC BAA-974T)

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High quality draft genome sequence of Segniliparus rugosus CDC 945T= (ATCC BAA-974T)
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, December 2011
DOI 10.4056/sigs.2255041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashlee M. Earl, Christopher A. Desjardins, Michael G. Fitzgerald, Harindra M. Arachchi, Qiandong Zeng, Teena Mehta, Allison Griggs, Bruce W. Birren, Nadege C. Toney, Janice Carr, James Posey, W. Ray Butler

Abstract

Segniliparus rugosus represents one of two species in the genus Segniliparus, the sole genus in the family Segniliparaceae. A unique and interesting feature of this family is the presence of extremely long carbon-chain length mycolic acids bound in the cell wall. S. rugosus is also a medically important species because it is an opportunistic pathogen associated with mammalian lung disease. This report represents the second species in the genus to have its genome sequenced. The 3,567,567 bp long genome with 3,516 protein-coding and 49 RNA genes is part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Human Microbiome Project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,240,151
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#142
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,089
of 249,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.