↓ Skip to main content

Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2020; published online March 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30144-4

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2020; published online March 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30144-4
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30251-6
Pubmed ID

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,491,107
of 14,723,957 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2,060
of 4,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,227
of 199,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#145
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,723,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.