↓ Skip to main content

Potential role of multiple carbon fixation pathways during lipid accumulation in Phaeodactylum tricornutum

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential role of multiple carbon fixation pathways during lipid accumulation in Phaeodactylum tricornutum
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-5-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Valenzuela, Aurelien Mazurie, Ross P Carlson, Robin Gerlach, Keith E Cooksey, Brent M Peyton, Matthew W Fields

Abstract

Phaeodactylum tricornutum is a unicellular diatom in the class Bacillariophyceae. The full genome has been sequenced (<30 Mb), and approximately 20 to 30% triacylglyceride (TAG) accumulation on a dry cell basis has been reported under different growth conditions. To elucidate P. tricornutum gene expression profiles during nutrient-deprivation and lipid-accumulation, cell cultures were grown with a nitrate to phosphate ratio of 20:1 (N:P) and whole-genome transcripts were monitored over time via RNA-sequence determination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 238 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 24%
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 13 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 16%
Environmental Science 13 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Chemical Engineering 9 4%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 58 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#842
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,198
of 180,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.