↓ Skip to main content

Ethical arguments concerning human-animal chimera research: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical arguments concerning human-animal chimera research: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-020-00465-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koko Kwisda, Lucie White, Dietmar Hübner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 16 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,936,214
of 19,911,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#216
of 874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,272
of 287,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,911,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them