↓ Skip to main content

Unusual honey pot building behaviour in captively reared bumble bees Bombus terrestris

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Apicultural Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unusual honey pot building behaviour in captively reared bumble bees Bombus terrestris
Published in
Journal of Apicultural Research, April 2015
DOI 10.3896/ibra.1.49.4.11
Authors

Sean A Rands, Dominic Clarke, James E Hallett, Heather M Whitney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,745,397
of 15,879,879 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Apicultural Research
#255
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,257
of 270,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Apicultural Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,879,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.