↓ Skip to main content

Anaphylaxis to husband's seminal plasma and treatment by local desensitization

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 216)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1914 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaphylaxis to husband's seminal plasma and treatment by local desensitization
Published in
Clinical and Molecular Allergy, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1476-7961-6-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaechun Lee, Sohyung Kim, Miok Kim, Young-Bae Chung, Jung-Sik Huh, Chul Min Park, Keun Hwa Lee, Jeong Hong Kim

Abstract

Hypersensitivity to human seminal fluid is rare but can be life threatening. We report a case of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to seminal plasma that was diagnosed by skin prick tests and successfully treated by local desensitization. A 32-year-old woman suffering from angioedema and hypotension after exposure to semen was treated with epinephrine upon admission. Skin prick tests and immunoblotting for IgE binding components showed that she was sensitized to her husband's seminal plasma. Local desensitization, which persisted for six months, was achieved by intravaginal administration of serial dilutions of her husband's seminal plasma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,914 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#167,572
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#1
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#440
of 180,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them