↓ Skip to main content

2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 198)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth
Published in
Scoliosis, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-7-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Negrini, Angelo G Aulisa, Lorenzo Aulisa, Alin B Circo, Jean Claude de Mauroy, Jacek Durmala, Theodoros B Grivas, Patrick Knott, Tomasz Kotwicki, Toru Maruyama, Silvia Minozzi, Joseph P O'Brien, Dimitris Papadopoulos, Manuel Rigo, Charles H Rivard, Michele Romano, James H Wynne, Monica Villagrasa, Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Fabio Zaina

Abstract

The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT), that produced its first Guidelines in 2005, felt the need to revise them and increase their scientific quality. The aim is to offer to all professionals and their patients an evidence-based updated review of the actual evidence on conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 385 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 22%
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 13%
Other 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 37 9%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 40 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 199 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 6%
Sports and Recreations 20 5%
Engineering 16 4%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 54 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#907,477
of 13,511,578 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis
#8
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,660
of 121,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,511,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them