You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism Studies, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/1461670x.2020.1745667 |
| Authors |
Jana Laura Egelhofer, Loes Aaldering, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, Sophie Lecheler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 10 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 49% |
| Scientists | 27 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 44 | 43% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#749,080
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Studies
#54
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,335
of 375,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Studies
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.