You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stability or Plasticity? – A Hierarchical Allostatic Regulation Model of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Function for Social Valuation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00281 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hackjin Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,815,798
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,906
of 10,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,908
of 374,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#122
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.