Title |
An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.abb6105 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Huaiyu Tian, Yonghong Liu, Yidan Li, Chieh-Hsi Wu, Bin Chen, Moritz U. G. Kraemer, Bingying Li, Jun Cai, Bo Xu, Qiqi Yang, Ben Wang, Peng Yang, Yujun Cui, Yimeng Song, Pai Zheng, Quanyi Wang, Ottar N. Bjornstad, Ruifu Yang, Bryan T. Grenfell, Oliver G. Pybus, Christopher Dye |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,649 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 215 | 13% |
China | 109 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 50 | 3% |
Pakistan | 28 | 2% |
France | 24 | 1% |
Canada | 24 | 1% |
Brazil | 23 | 1% |
Japan | 22 | 1% |
Germany | 21 | 1% |
Other | 263 | 16% |
Unknown | 870 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1438 | 87% |
Scientists | 146 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 33 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1353 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 192 | 14% |
Student > Master | 158 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 149 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 87 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 60 | 4% |
Other | 253 | 19% |
Unknown | 454 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 74 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 63 | 5% |
Engineering | 63 | 5% |
Other | 415 | 31% |
Unknown | 520 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1922. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,778
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Science
#264
of 80,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275
of 387,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#22
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.