You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alternative Quantifications of Landscape Complementation to Model Gene Flow in Banded Longhorn Beetles [Typocerus v. velutinus (Olivier)]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2020.00307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Borthwick, Alida de Flamingh, Maximilian H. K. Hesselbarth, Anjana Parandhaman, Helene H. Wagner, Hossam E. M. Abdel Moniem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 43% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,266,874
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#996
of 12,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,912
of 370,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#38
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.