↓ Skip to main content

Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. results for the global burden of disease 2000

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. results for the global burden of disease 2000
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-2-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Shibuya, Colin D Mathers, Cynthia Boschi-Pinto, Alan D Lopez, Christopher JL Murray

Abstract

Mortality estimates alone are not sufficient to understand the true magnitude of cancer burden. We present the detailed estimates of mortality and incidence by site as the basis for the future estimation of cancer burden for the Global Burden of Disease 2000 study. Age- and sex- specific mortality envelope for all malignancies by region was derived from the analysis of country life-tables and cause of death. We estimated the site-specific cancer mortality distributions from vital records and cancer survival model. The regional cancer mortality by site is estimated by disaggregating the regional cancer mortality envelope based on the mortality distribution. Estimated incidence-to-mortality rate ratios were used to back calculate the final cancer incidence estimates by site. In 2000, cancer accounted for over 7 million deaths (13% of total mortality) and there were more than 10 million new cancer cases world wide in 2000. More than 60% of cancer deaths and approximately half of new cases occurred in developing regions. Lung cancer was the most common cancers in the world, followed by cancers of stomach, liver, colon and rectum, and breast. There was a significant variations in the distribution of site-specific cancer mortality and incidence by region. Despite a regional variation, the most common cancers are potentially preventable. Cancer burden estimation by taking into account both mortality and morbidity is an essential step to set research priorities and policy formulation. Also it can used for setting priorities when combined with data on costs of interventions against cancers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 55 28%
Unknown 33 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,068
of 8,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,580
of 129,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.