↓ Skip to main content

What’s the best way to achieve successful mainstream partial nitritation-anammox application?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What’s the best way to achieve successful mainstream partial nitritation-anammox application?
Published in
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2020
DOI 10.1080/10643389.2020.1745015
Authors

Songkai Qiu, Zebing Li, Yuansheng Hu, Lin Shi, Rui Liu, Lei Shi, Lujun Chen, Xinmin Zhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 28 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 20%
Engineering 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 35 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#455
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,631
of 396,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.