↓ Skip to main content

What’s the best way to achieve successful mainstream partial nitritation-anammox application?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What’s the best way to achieve successful mainstream partial nitritation-anammox application?
Published in
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2020
DOI 10.1080/10643389.2020.1745015
Authors

Songkai Qiu, Zebing Li, Yuansheng Hu, Lin Shi, Rui Liu, Lei Shi, Lujun Chen, Xinmin Zhan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 34%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 25%
Environmental Science 10 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,311,961
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#246
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,364
of 278,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.