↓ Skip to main content

Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperoxemia and excess oxygen use in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study
Published in
Critical Care, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2826-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiana Madotto, Emanuele Rezoagli, Tài Pham, Marcello Schmidt, Bairbre McNicholas, Alessandro Protti, Rakshit Panwar, Giacomo Bellani, Eddy Fan, Frank van Haren, Laurent Brochard, John G. Laffey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,399,149
of 18,100,306 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,318
of 5,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,500
of 281,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,100,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them