You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Change in alcohol outlet density and alcohol-related harm to population health (CHALICE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Fone, Frank Dunstan, James White, Chris Webster, Sarah Rodgers, Shin Lee, Narushige Shiode, Scott Orford, Alison Weightman, Iain Brennan, Vas Sivarajasingam, Jennifer Morgan, Richard Fry, Ronan Lyons |
| Abstract |
Excess alcohol consumption has serious adverse effects on health and violence-related harm. In the UK around 37% of men and 29% of women drink to excess and 20% and 13% report binge drinking. The potential impact on population health from a reduction in consumption is considerable. One proposed method to reduce consumption is to reduce availability through controls on alcohol outlet density. In this study we investigate the impact of a change in the density of alcohol outlets on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms to health in the community. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,290,710
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,031
of 17,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,328
of 180,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#49
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.