↓ Skip to main content

Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development

Overview of attention for article published in EBioMedicine, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,287)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
599 Mendeley
Title
Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development
Published in
EBioMedicine, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun Kim, Geza Erdos, Shaohua Huang, Thomas W. Kenniston, Stephen C. Balmert, Cara Donahue Carey, V. Stalin Raj, Michael W. Epperly, William B. Klimstra, Bart L. Haagmans, Emrullah Korkmaz, Louis D. Falo, Andrea Gambotto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,250 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 599 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 15%
Student > Bachelor 79 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 12%
Student > Master 61 10%
Other 38 6%
Other 124 21%
Unknown 136 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 38 6%
Engineering 31 5%
Other 152 25%
Unknown 161 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4000. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#444
of 16,060,661 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#1
of 2,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98
of 272,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#1
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,060,661 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.