You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martini, Mara, De Piccoli, Norma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,424,230
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,895
of 30,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,388
of 364,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#71
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.