↓ Skip to main content

Traditional food and herbal uses of wild plants in the ancient South-Slavic diaspora of Mundimitar/Montemitro (Southern Italy)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional food and herbal uses of wild plants in the ancient South-Slavic diaspora of Mundimitar/Montemitro (Southern Italy)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-8-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro di Tizio, Łukasz Jakub Łuczaj, Cassandra L Quave, Sulejman Redžić, Andrea Pieroni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,277,289
of 23,928,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#212
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,570
of 169,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,928,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.