↓ Skip to main content

MI-MAAP: marker informativeness for multi-ancestry admixed populations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MI-MAAP: marker informativeness for multi-ancestry admixed populations
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12859-020-3462-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siqi Chen, Sudhir Ghandikota, Yadu Gautam, Tesfaye B. Mersha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,824,632
of 15,411,062 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,178
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,409
of 268,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,411,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.