↓ Skip to main content

Renomear para Recomeçar: Lógicas Onomásticas no Pós-abolição

Overview of attention for article published in Dados, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renomear para Recomeçar: Lógicas Onomásticas no Pós-abolição
Published in
Dados, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/001152582018154
Authors

Rogerio da Palma, Oswaldo Truzzi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,445,049
of 18,360,230 outputs
Outputs from Dados
#113
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,596
of 284,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dados
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,360,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them