↓ Skip to main content

Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods used in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s3-s32
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Winfrey, Robert McKinnon, John Stover

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 26 28%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 32%
Social Sciences 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,219,783
of 15,693,022 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,590
of 10,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,322
of 271,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,693,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them