You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tropical forest carbon balance in a warmer world: a critical review spanning microbial‐ to ecosystem‐scale processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00232.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tana E. Wood, Molly A. Cavaleri, Sasha C. Reed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 23% |
| Researcher | 44 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,636,934
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#415
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,145
of 179,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them