↓ Skip to main content

A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freedom N Gumedze, Dan Jackson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Mathematics 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,892,077
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,150
of 2,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,727
of 108,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.