↓ Skip to main content

A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A random effects variance shift model for detecting and accommodating outliers in meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freedom N Gumedze, Dan Jackson

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,467,362
of 14,572,831 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#676
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,278
of 129,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,572,831 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them