↓ Skip to main content

The application of observational data in translational medicine: analyzing tobacco-use behaviors of adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The application of observational data in translational medicine: analyzing tobacco-use behaviors of adolescents
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria Siciliano, Annalisa Pitino, Mercedes Gori, Olivia Curzio, Loredana Fortunato, Michael Liebman, Sabrina Molinaro

Abstract

Translational Medicine focuses on "bench to bedside", converting experimental results into clinical use. The "bedside to bench" transition remains challenging, requiring clinicians to define true clinical need for laboratory study. In this study, we show how observational data (an eleven-year data survey program on adolescent smoking behaviours), can identify knowledge gaps and research questions leading directly to clinical implementation and improved health care. We studied gender-specific trends (2000-2010) in Italian students to evaluate the specific impact of various anti-smoking programs, including evaluation of perceptions of access to cigarettes and health risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,925
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,299
of 163,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#34
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.