@Jamalisms @joelmead24 @DefiantLs Parrots keep parroting. Let’s #followthescience, shall we, where it’s been shown that school closures didn’t impact outcomes. This is one of dozens of easily-found publications: https://t.co/l71hwXtY8g https://t.co/4x4MU
@DoctorJLCastro 1.- The Lancet. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. https://t.co/QyhLjUEwNv
RT @okuvad: @mymlan @bills_n_thrills Skolstängningar har också varit ett mycket effektivt sätt att minska smittspridningen i början av pand…
RT @okuvad: @mymlan @bills_n_thrills Skolstängningar har också varit ett mycket effektivt sätt att minska smittspridningen i början av pand…
RT @okuvad: @mymlan @bills_n_thrills Skolstängningar har också varit ett mycket effektivt sätt att minska smittspridningen i början av pand…
@mymlan @bills_n_thrills Skolstängningar har också varit ett mycket effektivt sätt att minska smittspridningen i början av pandemin och räddade därför många liv. Klart det är inte optimalt men alternativet var på många ställen en total vårdkollaps med må
@thereal_truther @Dierenbach @OpDracula And while not \/axx directly related, policies brought to us by the same people: https://t.co/JZhsHehRM4
@justin_hart @JamesSurowiecki That was seen early in Asia and consistently seen in US data through the pandemic. https://t.co/OQuA2hRpxW. Probably because high asymptomatic rate = lower secondary transmission rate https://t.co/dTASEPkUFL
@laurenboebert Bless your heart, as per the attached, over 100 school systems were closed in March of 2020, which was the beginning. TRUMP was president then and for the following 10 months. https://t.co/yQKNqT3Jjb
RT @Kohlrabi82: Ich kenne leider etliche Naturwissenschaftler, die diese Art der Beweislastumkehr und Verrat an der wissenschaftlichen Meth…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
RT @Kohlrabi82: Ich kenne leider etliche Naturwissenschaftler, die diese Art der Beweislastumkehr und Verrat an der wissenschaftlichen Meth…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
Ich kenne leider etliche Naturwissenschaftler, die diese Art der Beweislastumkehr und Verrat an der wissenschaftlichen Methode akzeptiert und unterstützt haben.
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
RT @musikutiv: noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen…
noch ein Schmankerl: wenn #Studien keinen robusten Effekt von #Schulschliessungen zeigen, müsste man geschlossene Schulen eigentlich sofort öffnen. nicht so die Denkweise von @Karl_Lauterbach
RT @karamballes: Infact Viner has been a important figure in ensuring schools didn't have the adequate protections he claimed we have. His…
RT @SarahDRasmussen: Here was my very first thread on Twitter, about an April 2020 systematic review on school closures that misreported st…
Thread🧵 unrolled: https://t.co/GQWzO6o8T9
RT @SarahDRasmussen: School closures + bad science (THREAD) Remember that 6 Apr Lancet C&AH systematic review on school closures--with tha…
RT @SarahDRasmussen: School closures + bad science (THREAD) Remember that 6 Apr Lancet C&AH systematic review on school closures--with tha…
Time to also re-read this great early thread by @SarahDRasmussen about the ‘systematic’ review published just weeks before the e-mails (see next tweet). It is clear consequences of infections in children are nothing when the reputation of an academic is on
@MarvinH2_G2 @itosettiMD_MBA @farid__jalali All in the name of balance. Balance with all the Lancet papers that were coming out. https://t.co/a7UI56vtov
RT @KevinBardosh: The evidence was clear early on https://t.co/cKnq10kco8
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: The evidence was clear early on https://t.co/cKnq10kco8
The evidence was clear early on https://t.co/cKnq10kco8
@Forensic_Stats @trishgreenhalgh Screen shot is from an old version of the green book Here's the viner study, think its the right link https://t.co/Pp14pPFzD9
"At the same time, these data also show that school closures can have profound economic and social consequences." 3/3 https://t.co/TMPsf3K0RP
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
RT @mimiryudo: 5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure…
5⃣ Adopter un dépistage réactif seulement, moins efficace qu'un dépistage itératif. Le dépistage itératif est la meilleure solution, la moins impactante du point de vue économique et logistique. (Bien sûr en maintenant les dépistages des cas contacts) ht
@DellAnnaLuca Here you go. Is The Lancet good enough for you? https://t.co/2cAXgyNcPn
@DellAnnaLuca An April 2020 systematic review in The Lancet found little reason to think school closures, which are effective for flu, stop the spread of coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2, “for which transmission dynamics appear to be different.” https://t.co/
@drklausner You're giving the anti-schoolers too much credit. Even the influenza-based lit review in the Lancet found negligible benefits and cautioned against prolonged school closures. https://t.co/mqcaVeZxaD
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
Evidence back in 2020 https://t.co/pX9Er9Nxqd
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
Will they learn?
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
RT @KevinBardosh: Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusi…
Published in April 2020: Don't close schools for COVID-19. Did we listen? Not really. Data in 2022 supports this conclusion & shows school closures had significant social harms. https://t.co/onUjdqP6PN https://t.co/yoBciZGPFM
DEFINE_ME https://t.co/S2gsiDB0Hl
2 of 6: Looking at Europe alone, there is also no consistent association. By April 2020, studies were already questioning the effectiveness and benefit/risk ratios of school closures: https://t.co/GTWaYmO8m2 https://t.co/vMXCueCbbZ
RT @Argentum7411: @MagnetoDark @papusyolivus Tengo un hilo! 😤 https://t.co/iba3S9rfAc
@MagnetoDark @papusyolivus Tengo un hilo! 😤 https://t.co/iba3S9rfAc
@superkakolak @Costagliola @ISlovan Juste une remarque neanmoins : ce papier reste prudent sur SARS & Covid, l'effet que le tweet ci-dessous mentionne concerne la littérature influenza. (Ce qui correspond à ce que j'indiquais plus haut dans ce thread d
RT @SarahDRasmussen: School closures + bad science (THREAD) Remember that 6 Apr Lancet C&AH systematic review on school closures--with tha…
@ajlamesa @nytimes @Folkhalsomynd Why'd they ignore this one from April 2020! https://t.co/xLLH7Mwu1V
RT @Argentum7411: 1.- The Lancet. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including C0VlD-l9: a rapid systemat…
Es hora de volver a sacar este hilo 😂👇 Na nit...
@atrupar Have no respect for the guy - but it is like almost everyone is TRYING to misunderstand the basis for his statement. Read the rerenced Lancet Journal article even when the abstract is public : https://t.co/zL8HWhiQdu