↓ Skip to main content

Macrolide treatment for COVID-19: Will this be the way forward?

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience Trends, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 214)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions
Title
Macrolide treatment for COVID-19: Will this be the way forward?
Published in
BioScience Trends, April 2020
DOI 10.5582/bst.2020.03058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masashi Ohe, Haruki Shida, Satoshi Jodo, Yoshihiro Kusunoki, Masahide Seki, Ken Furuya, Houman Goudarzi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#987,265
of 15,398,963 outputs
Outputs from BioScience Trends
#7
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,169
of 269,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience Trends
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,398,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.