You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misinformation During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: How Knowledge Emerges From Noise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Explorations, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1097/cce.0000000000000098 |
| Authors |
Bram Rochwerg, Rachael Parke, Srinivas Murthy, Shannon M. Fernando, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, John Marshall, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Kirsten Fiest, Rob Fowler, François Lamontagne, Jonathan E. Sevransky |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 34% |
| Canada | 24 | 18% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 52% |
| Scientists | 35 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 29% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#508,037
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Explorations
#33
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,928
of 373,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Explorations
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.