You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Misinformation During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: How Knowledge Emerges From Noise
Critical Care Explorations, April 2020
Bram Rochwerg, Rachael Parke, Srinivas Murthy, Shannon M. Fernando, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, John Marshall, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Kirsten Fiest, Rob Fowler, François Lamontagne, Jonathan E. Sevransky
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||69||52%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||20||15%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||9||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||12||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||10||11%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||22||25%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||8||9%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Explorations
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 373,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Explorations
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.