↓ Skip to main content

Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007274.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davinder Garewal, Steve Powell, Stephen J Milan, Jonas Nordmeyer, Pallavi Waikar

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an uncomfortable therapeutic procedure that cannot be performed without adequate sedation or general anaesthesia. A considerable number of ERCPs are performed annually in the UK (at least 48,000) and many more worldwide.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 20 30%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 57%
Unspecified 13 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,395,211
of 13,401,642 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,902
of 10,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,245
of 121,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,401,642 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.