You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Processing Methodologies Can Distort and Bias Power Spectral Density Estimates of Seismic Background Noise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seismological Research Letters, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1785/0220190212 |
| Authors |
Robert E. Anthony, Adam T. Ringler, David C. Wilson, Manochehr Bahavar, Keith D. Koper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 56% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#12,858,621
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Seismological Research Letters
#804
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,162
of 373,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seismological Research Letters
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.