↓ Skip to main content

The neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid disrupts bumblebee foraging rhythms and sleep

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid disrupts bumblebee foraging rhythms and sleep
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.04.07.030023
Authors

Tasman, Kiah, Rands, Sean A, Hodge, James J L

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,068,318
of 15,418,159 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#14,962
of 88,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,236
of 269,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1,280
of 8,211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,418,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.