RT @AntGDuarte: A few weeks after Tang et al, Forster et al. published a higher-impact analysis of SARS-CoV-2 lineages. While letters chang…
@Execute_Vaxxers Isolated: https://t.co/KQtnvfdi3v
@jeffreyatucker April 2020 ‘…we have named A, B, and C, with #TypeA being the ancestral type according to the 🦇 outgroup 🦠’ ‘A and C types are found in significant proportions…in Europeans & Americans. In contrast, the B type is…most common type in
@uTobian @catoletters A = 🇺🇸 mid-2019 B = 🇨🇳 late 2019 C = near Europe July 2019 (#FtDetrick) https://t.co/jrJgAomFdo Aug 2019 https://t.co/e9mu7KnoNM https://t.co/BLOznw6Acd https://t.co/WqILubKO4L https://t.co/fmMoFIgktm https://t.co/hJKfHBzbW6 ht
ケンブリッジの研究 Forster論文 https://t.co/48aOrRmY0X 約29,000の塩基のうち1,000の違いを無視したネットワーク法は役に立たない
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia" 2/6 https://t.co/s2nljyXxtW
@WHu144 找到了,剑桥的 https://t.co/PFW24lpY7Z
@hooyan2525 堂々とした嘘っぱち論文 ケンブリッジがーとマスコミ多用 C系言論人大喜び アリゾナと蝙蝠コロナを一つのグループにし始祖と 実際は約26000塩基の4%1000塩基以上が両者は違う SARS-2全体でこの時期15個程度https://t.co/88x9ILeYar
@toshi_tomie 論文を見つけました この論文は20年2月までの系統ネットワークをつくり、RaTG13に近いのがAだと言っています。 解釈を間違えている。 日付も矛盾しません https://t.co/88x9ILeYar
@FreeManOnEarth9 Apart from 20m isolations? https://t.co/9Sgs6heuXL
RT @priscilagural: https://t.co/4sYGqlSE6H A & C found in Americans & Europeans, non-Asian origin
https://t.co/4sYGqlSE6H A & C found in Americans & Europeans, non-Asian origin
The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia🔽 https://t.co/s2nljyXxtW
@funnyvalle @FSeptique @AlexSamTG @JPasquet @TheSun Quand The Sun pointe le P4 de Wuhan, ce n'est qu'APRÈS, bien après que les soupçons se soient portés, sur la base de solides arguments scientifiques, vers les USA. https://t.co/c3moyHMevh
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
Un scientifique démontre par une analyse phylogénétique que le #SarsCOV2 vient des USA, et que se passe t-il ? Un torchon appartenant à l'oligarque Rupert Murdoch pond une "enquête détaillée" pour relancer la piste "Wuhan", en dépit des preuves. 🤡🤥 http
@armerie13 @saraart4 Ce virus ne vient pas de Chine mais d'un labo amérikkkain (peut-être Fort-Detrick). https://t.co/Dku0VuFXEW
@Poulin2012 Le Sunday Times ne fait que relayer une intox de la CIA, démentie depuis 2020 par l'épidémiologie phylogénétique. On sait depuis 2020 que ce virus est sorti d'un labo amérikkkain (Fort Detrick ?) et non du P4 de Wuhan. https://t.co/Dku0VuFXEW
@Ken__kaneki33 Le 25 octobre 2020, on le savait déjà : https://t.co/Dku0VuFXEW
@tatiann69922625 25 octobre 2020: https://t.co/Dku0VuFXEW
Blocked me after this one 😂
Info you need to know https://t.co/KmpMoj9E1q
@DerfGnid @CilComLFC If you're talking about the PSA test - sure - it's questionable but all we had at the time. If you talking about #COVID is very different. https://t.co/ozhmGKWK7G
RT @Rossana38510044: @Daoyu15 @toadmeister As described by Forster these genomes were not dominant in Wuhan but in other parts of China and…
RT @Rossana38510044: @Daoyu15 @toadmeister As described by Forster these genomes were not dominant in Wuhan but in other parts of China and…
@Daoyu15 @toadmeister As described by Forster these genomes were not dominant in Wuhan but in other parts of China and in the US. https://t.co/u53hiiSg7q https://t.co/g1Al0FMZfX
@knightradiantt @R_H_Ebright @sense_strand @TheCryptonaut2 @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @Debunk_the_Funk @jaredpretender @mentju4 @RobertWager1 @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @Greg21143362 @TomahawkVPhD @NIH @PeterDaszak The fact that you think that genetic s
@Agus1Sunnely @TheChiefNerd ‘…type A - the original virus most closely related to the virus found in both bats and pangolins…prevalent in 🇦🇺 and the 🇺🇸.’ https://t.co/t59ZCYsqlG https://t.co/6i4dNnLkay Taiwan news ~ CIA op? https://t.co/qhtwfPW0dz ht
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
@Michaelhsinchu @LimuyTayal @Harmony_Reform @Peter61397 @huskypuppies111 @edgaryu7 沙雕,好好去看看裡面的A型是什麼概念,順便再看看A型在你美爹那裡的佔比,別出來丟人了行不? 你說的那句話的意思是在其祖先類型(也就是A型)變異為B型之前,似乎不太可能傳到其他地區,這句話有那麼難理解?還是說你這沙雕看到不太可能傳到別的地區就高潮了?什麼煞筆😂 https://t.co/lXiEZKSyz2
RT @DrKynast: #Phylogenetic #network analysis of #SARS_CoV_2 genomes | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences @PNASNews Highly unl…
#Phylogenetic #network analysis of #SARS_CoV_2 genomes | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences @PNASNews Highly unlikely that #SARSCoV2 Spreading unlikely (impossible) inertia of @POTUS45 & @EU_Commission & @Australia O2-04 2020 led to #p
@JohnnyKayoss @ErichRRodgers @zapta30 @Meekeebgd @JACEcorp @JustOGG @mtracey You must love proving how uneducated you are. Your explaining the meaning of a link,not a peer reviewed study Here's some links to the peer reviewed studies I quote, not that yo
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
@Watcheronthew15 @TakeThatDarwin @xbgix @Ah_Science @GodIsntR3al @punishedmother @James_CampII @prageru But evolution is observed in real time. So is the 2nd law flawed or do you not understand physics? https://t.co/ecY6Qm9Im7 https://t.co/16jk6rTrIf htt
@chalmers_noel @RossWHarrington In fact, fcuk it, I'll indulge you for a couple of posts. Read this, you'll say it's shit, delusional people usually do. But I don't care what you think. https://t.co/5mefSJD9q9
@bduujopcsq @AndyBxxx Yes absolutely..also because COVID strains slightly different in Chna vs US vs EU.... https://t.co/TEMqnBWbSp
@Rossana38510044 Early (March-April 2020) articles, videos, etc from at least three countries were saying :: Type A = USA Type B = China Type C = Europe https://t.co/fmMoFIgktm Almost all of 🇦🇺’s original 🦠 was the 🇺🇸 strain ~ less than 1% from Asian ho
@TheJikky @biorxivpreprint Early (March - April 2020) articles, studies, vids from a few different countries were showing :: Type A = USA Type B = China Type C = Europe https://t.co/fmMoFIxnvm https://t.co/dJqDFLTZyW
@AGHuff Not sure what you mean? Prof Sachs is pretty solid on geopolitics 🙂 I’ve liked him for years. It’s a really valuable interview + is being censored/smeared for a reason… Early analysis’ showed :: Type A = USA Type B = China Type C = Europe Apri
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
2) parce que maintenant qu'il y a un début de consensus mondial pour pencher vers une origine artificielle du #SarsCov2, la question de son labo d'origine se pose. 3) parce que l'épidémiologie phylogénétique du virus indique une origine amérikkkaine : htt
@VillanovistPal @Graybea71861266 @TRyanGregory @EntropyChase They don’t like Peter Forster either… https://t.co/gPWapROV7S
@cshperspectives PNAS?! 🤔
A PNAS paper on COVID-19 origins… totally refused by the entire scientific community… https://t.co/gPWapROV7S Lol…
@cshperspectives @PhilippMarkolin Yeah, so, why everyone refuses this one?! 🤔 https://t.co/gPWapROV7S
Basta mirar la filogenética de un virus para saber por qué los virus existen pese a las vacunaciones. Aquí tienen un trazado filogenético del SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/fUNNDnEtHh https://t.co/i1bWASCMbc https://t.co/eymfHWJyXE
@2800Russell @THEVENONPierri1 @CDiscute Tu ne sais donc pas ce qu'est un séquençage ? Ah. Des preuves, t'en as plein. Pour quelqu'un qui fait ses propres recherches c'est dommage 🙂 https://t.co/VmD0GRhfsd https://t.co/EiHPn30WAZ https://t.co/o1ggmeRhCA
@dockaurG April 2020 :: Numerous early articles stated that Type A (closest strain to the one found in bats) was rampant across the 🇺🇸 + Australia. China = Type B (secondary strain). https://t.co/D2YagHs4ef https://t.co/qPkuPQZHGO
@pathogenetics @0bj3ctivity @RolandBakerIII @EduEngineer @WIRED @sergeilkp @kumar_lab “A & C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in 🇪🇺 & 🇺🇸 (…) B type is the most common type in East Asia, and its ancestral genome
@acritschristoph @jbkinney @JFWSchlesinger @alstromerias1 It's possible to draw haplotype networks w line lengths proportional to # of mutations. Foster did this w similar data in 2020: https://t.co/MEupmNgWPp Still shows A & B, but appearance differ
RT @LolaLee516: PNAS RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/Xdap1COw0s
@apwk0rg @rtiggerm AND Isolated: https://t.co/KQtnvfdi3v
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/zQ57AYbRkY
@AndyOiseau @BreezerGalway @DoctorLunge @MichaelYeadon3 @beverleyturner @BerryTartlet @MrSausager @BernieSpofforth @ClareCraigPath Psst. Why do you have to needlessly insult? Is this what they teach at bot school? https://t.co/9Sgs6heuXL https://t.co/88PyB
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
@priscilagural @iot_pat “These American patients are reported to have had a history of residence in the presumed source of the outbreak in Wuhan.”https://t.co/IMyrEe26qo
RT @priscilagural: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS — Strain B mostly found in China 🇨🇳; Strain A predominates in…
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS — Strain B mostly found in China 🇨🇳; Strain A predominates in the United States 🇺🇸 https://t.co/HLlVMeaSKi
@ZatannaZorElle @willpow53447649 @iamisaided There were even earlier study that suggested that it was from U.S. or Europe before Wuhan. The A type (origin variant) is predominantly in America & Europe. Wuhan dominant strain was a mutation - B variant o
RT @LolaLee516: PNAS RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/Xdap1COw0s
@Kazberro @Alex_on_A14 @jneill Buy now while stocks last https://t.co/XdVRzyvGdb https://t.co/O0Tg6U03Bs https://t.co/9Sgs6heuXL
@HumblePie_cL85 @RPKangaX Here you go. 3 of thousands. Won't do much for your teeth though. https://t.co/9Sgs6heuXL https://t.co/88PyBbyhbj https://t.co/O0Tg6U03Bs
@EduEngineer @ichudov April 2020 :: ‘Researchers … found the virus now seen in Wuhan, China and East Asia — ground-zero for the outbreak — is not the original variety. Type A is the version now most prevalent in America and Australia.’ https://t.co/qPkuP
@gsgs2 @Ayjchan @user3425664 This is from Forster. Blue is US https://t.co/u53hiiSg7q https://t.co/2LjSLbsEM1
@TimJSherman @ozofperception @TheSeeker268 Similar findings as Forster. The market was clearly just an amplifier. https://t.co/u53hiiSg7q
RT @revoltes: 8 avril 2020: une équipe autour de Peter Forster publie une analyse phylogénétique des souches du virus, et montre au passage…
RT @OccupySchagen: @FrancisJeffrey7 @vandman777 @CassandraOccupy #Occupy: So you didn't read the UNZ review "The Hunt for Patient Zero". Yo…
RT @OccupySchagen: @FrancisJeffrey7 @vandman777 @CassandraOccupy #Occupy: So you didn't read the UNZ review "The Hunt for Patient Zero". Yo…
https://t.co/Sa4i9E4Z9k Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS
@JohnPapasIdeas 1. Never happened 2. Isolation has occurred thousands of times worldwide in the last 2 years.https://t.co/a7lQrgGcvx https://t.co/te53n4zjgD And it's on sale https://t.co/XdVRzyvGdb
RT @OlgaVPettersson: Продвинутым будет особенно интересен и метод: https://t.co/UFC8PBKB6J.
Продвинутым будет особенно интересен и метод: https://t.co/UFC8PBKB6J.
@dogfeet100 One of several thousand https://t.co/a7lQrgGcvx
RT @dreamgbutterfly: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/vwReFNXvTx https://t.co/bXQAFrWosL
US 4000 patents on bat & corona virus experiments. #FortDetrick leaked it June 02/19 infecting local animals & people and called it vaping death. https://t.co/aXBgUsOAAI Its staff went to Wuhan, Italy, Spain and logs in philogenetic network picks
@wildwillie04 @Fran__Jacobs Was one the Vatican? Back in the real world it's readily available https://t.co/a7lQrgGcvx