↓ Skip to main content

Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010582.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Kumar Dutta, Ashish Goel, Richard Kirubakaran, Ashok Chacko, Prathap Tharyan

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 30 16%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 71 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 20%
Unspecified 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 80 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,589,693
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,513
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,199
of 369,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.