↓ Skip to main content

Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 17,555)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
820 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
445 Mendeley
Title
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19
Published in
Circulation, June 2020
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.120.047463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana P. Edelson, Comilla Sasson, Paul S. Chan, Dianne L. Atkins, Khalid Aziz, Lance B. Becker, Robert A. Berg, Steven M. Bradley, Steven C. Brooks, Adam Cheng, Marilyn Escobedo, Gustavo E. Flores, Saket Girotra, Antony Hsu, Beena D. Kamath-Rayne, Henry C. Lee, Rebecca E. Lehotsky, Mary E. Mancini, Raina M. Merchant, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Ashish R. Panchal, Mary Ann R. Peberdy, Tia T. Raymond, Brian Walsh, David S. Wang, Carolyn M. Zelop, Alexis A. Topjian, Monique Anderson Starks, Bentley J. Bobrow, Melissa Chan, Katherine Berg, Jonathan P. Duff, Benny L. Joyner, Javier J. Lasa, Arielle Levy, Melissa Mahgoub, Michael F. O’Connor, Amber V. Hoover, Amber J. Rodriguez, Garth Meckler, Kathryn Roberts, Nicholas M. Mohr, Boulos Nassar, Lewis Rubinson, Robert M. Sutton, Stephen M. Schexnayder, Monica Kleinman, Allan de Caen, Ryan Morgan, Farhan Bhanji, Susan Fuchs, Mark Terry, Mary McBride, Michael Levy, Jose G. Cabanas, David K. Tan, Vivek K. Moitra, Joseph W. Szokol

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 820 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 445 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 15%
Other 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Student > Master 40 9%
Student > Postgraduate 39 9%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 102 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 121 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 837. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,114
of 16,636,435 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#33
of 17,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#683
of 274,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#2
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,636,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.