You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phenotype and functionality of follicular helper T cells in patients with acute dengue infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12929-020-00641-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ayesha Wijesinghe, Jayani Gamage, Hemantha Goonewardena, Laksiri Gomes, Deshni Jayathilaka, Dulharie T. Wijeratne, Ruklanthi de Alwis, Chandima Jeewandara, Ananda Wijewickrama, Graham S. Ogg, Gathsaurie Neelika Malavige |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Singapore | 1 | 33% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,793,181
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#625
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,429
of 400,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.