↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of free breathing versus breath-hold in perfusion imaging using dynamic volume CT.

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of free breathing versus breath-hold in perfusion imaging using dynamic volume CT.
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13244-012-0169-9
Pubmed ID
Abstract

To compare two scanning protocols (free breathing versus breath-hold) for perfusion imaging using dynamic volume computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate their effects on image registration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 57%
Engineering 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,002,802
of 4,505,692 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#74
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,331
of 76,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.