↓ Skip to main content

Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystian B Oliveira, Christopher G Maher, Manuela L Ferreira, Mark J Hancock, Vinicius Cunha Oliveira, Andrew J McLachlan, Bart W Koes, Paulo H Ferreira, Steven P Cohen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#506,006
of 16,270,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,253
of 11,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,398
of 271,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,270,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.