↓ Skip to main content

A national internet-linked based database for pediatric interstitial lung diseases: the French network

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A national internet-linked based database for pediatric interstitial lung diseases: the French network
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-7-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Nathan, Rola Abou Taam, Ralph Epaud, Christophe Delacourt, Antoine Deschildre, Philippe Reix, Raphaël Chiron, Ulrika de Pontbriand, Jacques Brouard, Michaël Fayon, Jean-Christophe Dubus, Lisa Giovannini-Chami, François Bremont, Katia Bessaci, Cyril Schweitzer, Marie-Laure Dalphin, Christophe Marguet, Véronique Houdouin, Françoise Troussier, Anne Sardet, Eglantine Hullo, Isabelle Gibertini, Malika Mahloul, Delphine Michon, Adrien Priouzeau, Laurie Galeron, Jean-François Vibert, Guillaume Thouvenin, Harriet Corvol, Jacques deBlic, Annick Clement, Rola Taam

Abstract

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in children represent a heterogeneous group of rare respiratory disorders that affect the lung parenchyma. After the launch of the French Reference Centre for Rare Lung Diseases (RespiRare®), we created a national network and a web-linked database to collect data on pediatric ILD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 55%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,979,174
of 5,041,086 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#366
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,134
of 71,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,041,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.