Title |
The imperative of interpretable machines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Machine Intelligence, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s42256-020-0171-8 |
Authors |
Julia Stoyanovich, Jay J. Van Bavel, Tessa V. West |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Turkey | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
Scientists | 18 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 35% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 11 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,484,604
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Nature Machine Intelligence
#331
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,701
of 378,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Machine Intelligence
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.