↓ Skip to main content

Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero‐flow stream gage readings

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
86 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero‐flow stream gage readings
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/wat2.1436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret A. Zimmer, Kendra E. Kaiser, Joanna R. Blaszczak, Samuel C. Zipper, John C. Hammond, Ken M. Fritz, Katie H. Costigan, Jacob Hosen, Sarah E. Godsey, George H. Allen, Stephanie Kampf, Ryan M. Burrows, Corey A. Krabbenhoft, Walter Dodds, Rebecca Hale, Julian D. Olden, Margaret Shanafield, Amanda G. DelVecchia, Adam S. Ward, Meryl C. Mims, Thibault Datry, Michael T. Bogan, Kate S. Boersma, Michelle H. Busch, C. Nathan Jones, Amy J. Burgin, Daniel C. Allen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 16%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#470,270
of 19,049,821 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#14
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,320
of 287,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,049,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.