| Title |
Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmc2009316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Desmond Sutton, Karin Fuchs, Mary D’Alton, Dena Goffman |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,248 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2923 | 26% |
| Japan | 696 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 298 | 3% |
| Canada | 289 | 3% |
| Spain | 133 | 1% |
| Australia | 119 | 1% |
| France | 108 | <1% |
| Italy | 100 | <1% |
| Brazil | 96 | <1% |
| Other | 1011 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5475 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9549 | 85% |
| Scientists | 906 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 544 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 246 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 168 | 15% |
| Other | 117 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 110 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 70 | 6% |
| Other | 309 | 27% |
| Unknown | 281 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 435 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 151 | 13% |
| Unknown | 353 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8840. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#253
of 24,496,759 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#26
of 31,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 399,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#6
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,496,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.