You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for tobacco cessation in the dental setting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005084.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan B Carr, Jon Ebbert |
Abstract |
Tobacco use has significant adverse effects on oral health. Oral health professionals in the dental office or community setting have a unique opportunity to increase tobacco abstinence rates among tobacco users. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 24% |
United States | 5 | 12% |
Australia | 4 | 10% |
Canada | 3 | 7% |
Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
Brazil | 2 | 5% |
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 45% |
Scientists | 16 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 288 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
Researcher | 30 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 16% |
Unknown | 79 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 42% |
Psychology | 20 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 9% |
Unknown | 90 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#595,582
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,069
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,905
of 181,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.